What Are Theye Really Buying?

The so-called "globalists" seem on a clear agenda of pursuing the objective of giving the global human population a haircut in the style that suits the internationalist opinion on the question of "over-population".  This was made obvious by the ham-fisted operation referred to as the "pandemic", where a common cold virus that was obviously modified through human artifice into a weaponized form was unleashed upon an unsuspecting world.  Perhaps the more appropriate adjective to describe those events would be "blatant".  Any persistent perception of the pandemic as having been "organic" can be attributed only as the product of either deeply vested interest, or that of the manifestation of a deep psychosis.

None of this is surprising.

The globalists are avowed Malthusians. They firmly believe the world is "over-populated".

They may be right.

Or not.

The point is that they do not believe, and as a result, sit with their thumbs in their backsides, waiting for the human world to collapse into dust under the weight of the over-population they believe threatens all. They are marching to actively cull the population down by the force of positive steps grounded in cutting edge biotech.

What we are seeing makes perfect sense. The cull cannot be undertaken in a single fell swoop. Who would bury the bodies? What would the survivors do for things like food, clean water, and the maintenance of civilization in the aftermath? It would be a catastrophe that would consume survivors as well, if only in time.

This has to be done in stages. And it has to be alpha- and then beta-tested, lest the perpetrators be consumed as well.

A coup de grace cannot be fully delivered until at least two things happen:

1. "AI" bootstraps into self-perpetuation. After all, SOMEONE has to pick the lettuce as per Democrats and other psychotic-left lunatics.
2. Energy technology must pass a certain threshold such that the self-maintaining nature of the AIs comes within reach. Without power, there is no AI. A "robot" should be able to function for weeks, months, years, or even decades without having to replenish its power source.

But if these goals were to be achieved, there would be no further reason for the Malthusians to hold back. After all, they would have a race of mechanical agents to do their bidding, programmed as needed to serve the vast array of human purposes on the menu, moving forward.

However, and this is a big "but": I am by no means convinced that the progression of circumstance to fit this picture would produce the sufficiently exact result the Malthusians expect. Yes, strife of most forms would likely be eliminated, but I'm wondering whether they would become the victims of an ill-considered trimming, full of unanticipated and unintended consequences. And if perchance it turns out they were to realize they'd made a grave error, there would be no way to bring back those they murdered en masse. It would take many generations to replenish human numbers.

And perhaps finally, Theye would face the risk of not knowing how to turn off the thinking that got them to the place they will have had brought themselves. Specifically, the thinking now appears to be that of "us v. the useless eaters", which for all intents and purposes reduces to a test of purity. The Malthusians are "pure" and therefore worthy of life, whereas the rest are not. So they wipe out, say, 15 of every 16 people on the planet through engineered waves of pathogenic pestilence.

Now what? That brand of thinking, and here I speak in basic patterns and habits rather than in specific applications, is neither new, nor has it proven easy to eliminate once established in a population. Were it otherwise, we would not see blood feuds between populations that persist for centuries and millennia on end. Jews and Muslims are a fine example of this persistence, as are Serbs and Croats. They have hated each other for periods that make no rational sense. Hatfields and McCoys almost everywhere you look.

Given this, what is to say that once the "parasite class" had been eliminated, the Aryan survivors would not turn their eyes upon their fellows, seeking to discover others who might not be quite so pure as is required by whatever the standard du jour might demand? Or are we to believe that there will have had thereafter disappeared all human failing, including the lust for power by one man over his fellows?

It is not a far-fetched notion that the survivors might turn on one another in piecemeal fashion, reducing even those meager numbers to far skinnier proportions, the various populations perhaps inevitably separating themselves into feudal enclaves, each with their own robot armies poised and ready to rain havoc and destruction upon their once close comrades turned bitter enemies. This is by no means out of the question. Even the most cursory but honest examination of human history reveals this proclivity in stark monochrome. It isn't at all subtle, but rudely glaring and nakedly apparent to anyone with eyes to see.

And so we circle back to the idea that the Malthusians may not be buying what they think they are buying. But by the time they would realize the deeper and abiding truth of what it is they had done, it would be too late to retrieve. By doing it to the the Other, they may well have had done it to themselves. Could it be that the "useless eaters" were not quite so useless, after all? Only time will tell, of course.

Therefore, and until next time, please accept my best wishes.